( 1 ) THIS appeal, against an appellate order of the Rent Control Tribunal, has aiisen out of an application made under Order 21 Rule 16, Code of Civil Procedure by Shri Madan Lal respondent and his brother Shri Harish Chand.

( 2 ) THE appellant was a tenant of the premises in dispute under Shri Lakhu Ram, father of Shri Madan Lal and Shri Harish Chand, Shri Lakhu Ram had filed an application, under section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, for the eviction of the appellant on the ground that he bonafide required the premises in dispute for occupation for residence for himself and for the members of the family dependent on him. The order, directing the eviction of the appellant was passed on the 17th January, 1964. The Additional Controller had held that Shri Madan Lal and his family members were dependent on Shri Lakhu Ram and that Shri Lakhu Ram bonafide required the premises in dispute for residence for himself, Shri Madan Lal and the members of his family. The appellant went up in appeal against the order of eviction. During the pendency of the appeal, Shri Harish Chand, the second son of Shri Lakhu Ram, was transferred to Delhi from Saharanpur. Shri Lakhu Ram put in