SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Del) 43

HARDAYAL HARDY, V.S.DESHPANDE
MAHAJOT SAHAI – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.N.TIKKU, Y.Dayal

V. S. DESHPANDE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this and the connected writ petition No. 110 of 1968 are owners of houses situated in those parts of Old Delhi which were declared as slum areas on 20th April 1957 by a notification issued under section 3 of the Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 (hereinafter called the Act ). On 30-6-1961, houses Nos. 2812 to 2845 including the houses of the petitioners in Pucca Katra being a part of the slum areas notified on 20th April 1957 were declared to be a clearance area by a notification issued under section 9 (1) of the Act (Annexure C to the writ petition ). On 22-10-1965, a clearance order (Annexure D to the writ petition) was passed under section 10 (1) of the Act calling upon the petitioners and other owners to demolish their houses in the clearance area within six weeks. The clearance order was confirmed by the Administrator of the union territory on 29-11-1965 under section 10 (2) of the Act (Annexure E ). On 24-11-1966, the Competent authority (Assistant Commissioner (Slums) Delhi Municipal Corporation) wrote to the petitioners informing them that if the petitioners fail to vacate the premises in respect of which the clear






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top