( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of six civil revisions (Civil Revisions Nos. 74 to 79 D of 1966) which can be coveniently disposed of together. The revisions are directed aga. inst the common appellate order of the Senior Subordinate Judge, Delhi, dated 31st January, 1963 by which the learned Judge reversed the order of the trial Court dated 16th July, 1965 and finally rejected the application of the plaintiffs in the suit for grant of temporary injunction. However, on admission of the revision, stay of eviction was granted by this court on 8th February, 1966.

( 2 ) THE material facts of the case giving rise to the dispute briefly stated are that firstly one suit was instituted by seven plaintiffs but later on the suit was split up in several suits and the original suit was continued by Om Parkash and other suits which have given rise to the revisions were instituted by Baldev Raj, Hardev Singh, Amrit Lal, Safari Lal Gurbachan Singh and Darga Parshad, respectively petitioners in Civil Revision, Nos. 74-D of 1986, 75-D of 1966 76 D of 1966, 77-D of 1966, 78-D of 1966 and 79-D of 1966. The suits were for the relief that a permanent injunction be issued restraining the def