SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Del) 211

H.R.KHANNA, JAGJIT SINGH
KISHAN CHAND SOOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.DAYAL, D.C.MATHUR, D.R.Sethi

Jagjit Singh, J.

( 1 ) THE short question involved in this case is as to whether the complaint filed against Kishan Chand Sood by Shri Devi Das Sharma, Station House Officer of the Roshanara Police Station, Delhi, purporting to be under section 182 of the Indian Penal Code, can be proceeded with or the proceedings should be quashed.

( 2 ) ON January 30, 1967 Kishan Chand Sood, hereafter, called the petitioner, had made a report in Police Station Roshanara Delhi, according to which that day he had been caused injuries by Suman Lal, Narinder Kumar and Tej Kaur. The report was written in the Roznamcha register and after the petitioner was got medically examined a case (F. I. R. No. 51) under section 324 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against the alleged assailants.

( 3 ) AS a result of investigation the report made by the petitioner was found to be false. On a report under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") the Subdivisional Magistrate, Sadar Bazar, accepted the police recommendation and through his order dated September 21, 1967 approved the cancellation of the case.

( 4 ) THE same day that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate appr

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top