( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed agaiiist the order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated July 14, 1969, affirming the order of the Additional Rent Controller directing eviction of appellant Boota Ram.

( 2 ) BALMAKAND, the respoadent in this appeal purchased evacuee property No, 178/1798, situated at Hardhian Singh Road, ward No, XVI Krol Bagh, New Delhi by means of a sale-certificate granted in his favour by the Rehabilitation Deptt. on July 29, 1959 declaring him to be an owner with effect from November 4, 1957 On January 23, 1965, he filed an application under section 14 (2) (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act claiming eviction of the tenant appellant from t3. e premises in his occupation which formed a part of the above property on the ground that the tenant had built a residence in Kirti Nagar on plot No. 81, Block f and that the tenant had denied the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties even though after the purchase of the property by him (Balmukand) the respondent, Boota Ram who occupied the premises as an allottee of the Custodian had become his tenant by operation of Section 29 of Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 3954