SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Del) 56

V.S.DESHPANDE
LALIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SAROJ KUMARI – Respondent


V. S. Deshpande, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a tenant s appeal against the concurrent orders of the Controller and the Rent Tribunal ordering his eviction from the premises on the ground that they are required by the respondent-landlord bona fide for her own residence and that she has no other reasonable suitable residential accommodation within the meaning of proviso (e) to sub-secticn (1) of section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called "the Act" ).

( 2 ) THE facts are not really in dispute. The respondent-landlord is a deserted wife and a midwife by profession. She acquired the premises in 1962 when she was occupying rented accommodation paying rent of Rs. 35. 00 per month. She nevertheless let out the premises to the appellant in 1963 on a monthly rent of Rs. 60. 00 The relations between the parties later became strained. The appellant applied to the Rent Controller for fixation of standard rent and the respondent filed a petition before the Controller for the eviction of the appellant on the ground that the respondent wanted the premises bona fide for her own residence. The standard rent has, in the meanwhile, been fixed at Rs. 35. 00 per month, that is at the same f








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top