( 1 ) THIS revision has been presented under section 115, Civil P. C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The competency of the revision under section 1 15, Civil P. C. is not pressed and the petitioners counsel has tried to justify his claim to interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) I he impugned order merely declined an application for reviewing an earlier order made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The grounds on which the prayer for review was disallowed are both on the merits and on the competency oi the application for review. After considering the various dates of the proceedings before the learned Tribunal it was observed that it could not be said that the evidence of the respondents before Tribunal was closed without giving enough opportunity to them or that the order dated 22nd May, 1968, which was sought to be reviewed, was against law or there was any legal mistake in that order. But this apart, no new fact was stated to have come to light as the result where of some further evidence was necessary to be led. There being no specific provision permitting review the learned Tribunal disallowed the pra