SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Del) 102

S.RANGARAJAN
SUJAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISONER, SALES TAX – Respondent


S. Rangarajn, J.

( 1 ) THE short question for decision in the civil writ petition is whether additional demand of Rs. 35,211. 40 for sales tax in respect of the motor-bodies built by the petitioner is valid. The decision of this question would depend upon the interpretation of item I of the First Schedule of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act 1941, as extended to the Union Territory of Delhi (hereinafter called the Act), as it stood prior to the amendment of the same by notification dated the 31st August 1966. It then read as follows:-

"motor vehicles, including chasis of motor vehicles, motor tyres and tubes and spare parts of Motor vehicles. "the expression accessories was introduced after motor tyres and tubes" but before "and spare parts of motor vehicles" with effect from 1st September, 1966 by the aforesaid notification. Since the assessment in question in this writ petition deals with the period prior to the said notification of the year 1966, we are not concerned, in this writ petition, with the question whether motor-bodies would come within the expression accessories or not. We are, on the other hand, concerned only with the question whether motor bodies would come unde











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top