SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Del) 103

O.M.PRAKASH, HARDAYAL HARDY
MANGAL SEN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Hardayal Hardy

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an award made by an arbitrator appointed under section 7 of the Resettlement of Displaced Persons (Land Acquisition) Act 60 of 1943, bereinatter to be called the Act. The appeal winch should ordinarily have been heard by a Single Bench, was ordered by the Hon ble the Chief Justice to be placed before a Division Bench for reasons mentioned in his order dated October 26,19137 and that is how it was laid before us.

"the appellant is the owner of certain land in village Basai Darapur which alongwith the land of some other owners, was acquired under Government s notification No F-l (136)48 LSG dated 1st January. 19-19 published in the Delhi State Gazette for the purpose of re-settlement of displaced persons. The project for which the acquisition of land WJ. S made is known as "the Industrial Area Scheme. "as the controversy in this case relates to the quantum of compensation the provision of the Act with which we are concerned is section 7 which lays down the method for determining compensation for the land acquired under the Act. The section provides that where the amount compensation can be fixed by agreement it shall be paid in acco















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top