SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Del) 148

M.R.A.ANSARI, S.K.KAPUR
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
HUKAM CHAND JAIN – Respondent


S. K. Kapur

( 1 ) PARADOXICAL though it may seem that a bulidiag, which according to tile Municipal Engineer s report recorded on April 8, 1958, was considered to be so dangerous as to call for demolition immediately, stands till today after the lapse of about eleven years, yet, in spite of the emphasis in this behalf by the learned counsel for the respondent, I do not propose to let my mind be influenced by this factor in deciding the question that arises in this Letters Patent Appeal, directed against the order of D. K. Mahajan, J. dated January 19, 1965. The fight between the parties is about the validity of an order by the appellant directing demolition of the building in question.

( 1 )

( 2 ). ON April 7, 1958, the Commissioner, Delhi Municipal Corporation, in purported exercise of powers conferred on him by section 491 of the Dilhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, directed that "all the powers conferred on mi under the various provisions of the Act shall be exercised also by Shri Ishwar Dayal, Deputy Commissioner, subject to my supervision, control and revision. " On April 8, 1958, the Municipal Engineer after inspecting the building recorded a note, the relevant part of which




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top