I.D.DUA, T.V.R.TATACHARI
AYA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MUNSHI RAM – Respondent
( 1 ) AYA Singh, defendant in the trial Court, presented an appeal in this Court from an order of the learned Additional District Judge dated 18th September, 1967 allowing the appeal of Manshi Ram plaintitff and after setting aside the Judgment and decree of the trial Court, remanding the case back to the Court of First instance for re-decision. By mistake an appeal was p"esented in this Court as a regular second appeal from a decree on which court fee of Rs. 686. 80 Paise was affixed. The office note shows that an enquiry was made from the counsel for the appellant as to how a regular second appeal lay against an order of remand. To this, the counsel replied that the appeal may be treated as an appeal from older and may accordingly be registered as first appeal from order. The office, without realising that it was, as a matter of fact, a second appeal, for it was the second appellate Jurisdiction of Ibis Court which was being invoked, registered the appeal as an F. A. 0. instead of an S A. O. The appeal was on this basis marked before a Division Bench for preliminary taring. The learned counsel for the appellant, when re-presenting the appeal with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.