SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Del) 184

V.S.DESHPANDE
WEARWELL CYCLE COMPANY INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
WEARWELL INDUSTRIES – Respondent


v. S. Deshpande, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the Additional District Judge, Delhi dated 16/5/1967 refusing the grant of temporary injunction to the plaintiff-appellant. The application for temporary injunction by the plaintiff before the Additional District Judge, though made under Order 39, Rules I and 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code. , was actually cov. ered by Order 39, Rule 2 alone inasmuch as the suit by the plaintiff was for restraining the defendants from committing "other injury of any kind" within the meaning of Rule 2 (1 ). The injury complained of was the harm caused to the plaintiff by the sale of deceptiv. e goods by the defendants. The order of the learned Additional District Judge was apparently, therefore, passed under Order 39, Rule 2 Civil Procedure Code and not under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code It was therefore, appealable under Order 43, Civil Procedure Code.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY, the facts leading to the filing of this appeal against the order dated 16/5/1967 passed by the Additional District Judge, dismissing the appellants application for temporary injunction are as follows:

( 3 ) SHRI K. C. Aggarwal, the father of defendant No.























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top