SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Del) 202

I.D.DUA, JAGJIT SINGH, S.K.KAPUR
E. T. SEN – Appellant
Versus
EDATATA NARAYANAN – Respondent


INDER DEV DUA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two criminal original applications (Criminal Original Nos. 39 and 40 of 1968) by Brig. E. T. Sen (Retd.) under section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution, raising as they do common questions, are being disposed of by one order.

( 2 ) BRIG. E. T. Sen is a retired Brigadier of the Indian Army, having retired in May, 1967 and is at present the Reser and Publisher and Shri Vidya Rattan, respondent No. 3, is the Correspondent of the "patriot", which is a local English Daily Newspaper published from New Delhi. According to the Petitioner, respondents Nos. 1 to 3 are siding with D. P. Sinha and doing their best to poison the public opinion against the petitioner. He has referred to the contents of the iues of the "patriot" dated 13. 7. 1968, 14. 7. 1968, 19. 5. 1968, 8. 6. 1968, 2. 7. 1968, 21. 7. 1968, 4. 8. 1968 and 13. 8. 1968 in support of the submission and it is averred that from the circumstances narrated in the application, as also from the manner of reporting, it is apparent that there is a persistent one-sided press campaign by the "patriot" against the cause of the petitioner with a view to poisoning the mind



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top