SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 53

I.D.DUA, T.V.R.TATACHARI
NIRANJAN DASS – Appellant
Versus
GULZARI LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.Dhir, Hari Chand, Sham Kishore

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been placed before us pursuant to my order dated 9. 11. 1966. It is directed against the order of the Tribunal under the Motor Vehicles Act, at Delhi, dated 12. 6. 1963 dismissing the petition of Niranjan Dass appellant claiming a sum of Rs. 15,000. 00 by way of damages and compensation for injuries suffered as a result of accident which took place on 17. 8. 1958. The facts may now be stated.

( 2 ) NIRANJAN Dass petitioner-appellant along with his wife came to Delhi from Ambala in a bus on 17. 8. 1958 and after getting down near the Delhi Railway Station, he hired a scooter No. DLD 6870 owned by Harbans Lal, respondent No. 2 and driven by Gulzari Lal No. 1, an employee of the owner, for carrying the appellant to New Delhi. The scooter was driven from Delhi Railway Statian towards the Fountain of the Chandni Chowk and on towards the Red Fort. While proceeding in Chandni Chowk a four-seater motor rickshaw No. D. L. C. 5427 driven by Santokh Singh, respondent No. 3, and owned by Teja Singh, respondent No 4 which was coming rashly and negligently from the opposite direction of Red Fort towards the Fountain, dashed against the right side of the scooter driven by Gu
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top