SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 90

T.V.R.TATACHARI
SPRINGDALES SCHOOL,NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
SATI TAHILRAMANI, NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.Vohra, M.K.CHAWLA, M.VADHVANI, N.H.Hingorani

( 1 ) THIS appeal was filed by the appellants-tenants under Order 43, Rule 1 (m) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order of the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, dated 2-1-1967, dismissing an application filed by the said appellants-tenants for recording an alleged compromise in the Application No. 877 of 1963, on his file.

( 2 ) THE above-mentioned Application No. 877 of 1963 was filed by the respondent-landlord before the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi, under Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, praying for the eviction of the appellants-tenants from the premises, "sati Villa", No. 1945/14, situated on Patel Road, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi-12, and included in Municipal Ward No. 17, on the grounds of sub-letting, assignment or parting with the possession of the premises, misuser of the premises for a purpose other than that for which the premises were let out, etc.

( 3 ) IN the course of the said proceedings, the respondent herein filed an application on 1-8-1966 under Section 15 (2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act praying that the appellants-tenants may be ordered to deposit arrears of rent at the agreed rate of Rs. 1,300 per mensem with effect from 15-9-1





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top