SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 94

M.M.ISMAIL
NARAINDEVI – Appellant
Versus
DEV RAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.N.TIKKU

M. M. Ismail

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises from an order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Delhi, dated 29th April, 1964. The short facts necessary for this parpose are that a son of the appellant herein, one Jagdish Kumar, was standing behind truck No. PNG 1861 in Naya Bazar near Suri Goods Transport Company, Delhi, on 22th July, 1960 at 7-5u P. M. when truck No. DLG 3749 driven by respondent No. 1 in the course of his employment with respondent No. 2, the owner of the truck, while reversing, dashed into truck No. PNG 1861 and crushed Jagdish Kumar who was standing behind it. Jagdish Kumar sustained injuries and succumbed to them in lrwin Hospital where he was taken. The present appellant filed a claim for compensation of Rs. 50,000. 00 from the respondents alleging that the accident resulting into the death of Jagdish Kumar was caused due to rash and negligent driving of respondent No. 1, who, while reversing his truck, did not take care to see that the road on the back was clear. Respondent No. 3 in the application was the insurer of the truck concerned.

( 2 ) THE claim of the appellant was resisted by the respondents on serveral grounds - On the basis of those objections, the M









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top