SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 180

S.N.SHANKAR
ATMA RAM – Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.N.AGGARWAL, R.DAYAL, URMILA KAPUR

S. N. Shankar, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in this case are the trustees of a body known as Delhi Cloth Market Trust Committee (hereinafter called "the Trust" ). It appears that the trust has been maintaining a staff consisting of 16chaukidars,ll Sweepers, electricians, I Clerk and 2 Munims. A dispute relating to certain general demands of these employees having arisen, between the management of the Trust and the employees, the same was referred for adjuaication to the Industrial Tribunal. Delhi. . In answer to the claim of the employees, it was contended on behalf of the Trust, by way of preliminary objection, that it was not an industry within the meaning of section 2 (j) of the Industrial Disputes Act. By an interim award, dated 12th of January, 1965, the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi has held that this contention of the Trust was wrong and that it was an industry falling within the definition of section 2 (j) of. the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitioners in this case are the trustees, who constitute the body of the Trust, and have. come up to this court with a prayer that a writ in the nature of certbrarior any other appropriate writ, direction or order may hi issued to quash the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top