SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 181

I.D.DUA, K.S.HEGDE
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
VIKANWALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PARVIN ANAND, R.L.AGARWAL, S.S.Chadha, VIRANVALI

Hegde, C. J.

( 1 ) - Regular First Appeals Nos. 90-D/ 56 and 121-D/1956 raise common questions of law and fact. They relate to a common incident that took place on March 16, 1952, at about 4 a. m. when railway engine No. 1175 belonging to the defendants collided with lorry No. DLB 1946 at railway crossing gate No. CI-2 in mile No. 2/15 on Delhi Kamal railway line. As a result of that accident two persons, by names, Tirath Singh and Nanoo died instantaneously.

( 2 ) REGULAR First Appeal No. 90-D of 1956 arises from suit No. 260 of 1954 on the file of the learned Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi. That was a suit filed by the widow and. the son of the deceased Tirath Singh. In that suit the Court below granted a decree for a sunn of Rs. 45,000. 00 against the defendants as damages resulting from the accident, mentioned above.

( 3 ) REGULAR First Appeal 121 D/ of 1956 arises from suit No. 259 of 1956 on the file of the same Judge. That was suit filed by the widow of Nanoo claiming damages as a result of the accident, referred to already. In that suit the Court below decreed a sum of Rs. 22,500. 00 in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants.

( 4 ) THE case for the plaintiffs in the two











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top