I.D.DUA, K.S.HEGDE
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
VIKANWALI – Respondent
( 1 ) - Regular First Appeals Nos. 90-D/ 56 and 121-D/1956 raise common questions of law and fact. They relate to a common incident that took place on March 16, 1952, at about 4 a. m. when railway engine No. 1175 belonging to the defendants collided with lorry No. DLB 1946 at railway crossing gate No. CI-2 in mile No. 2/15 on Delhi Kamal railway line. As a result of that accident two persons, by names, Tirath Singh and Nanoo died instantaneously.
( 2 ) REGULAR First Appeal No. 90-D of 1956 arises from suit No. 260 of 1954 on the file of the learned Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi. That was a suit filed by the widow and. the son of the deceased Tirath Singh. In that suit the Court below granted a decree for a sunn of Rs. 45,000. 00 against the defendants as damages resulting from the accident, mentioned above.
( 3 ) REGULAR First Appeal 121 D/ of 1956 arises from suit No. 259 of 1956 on the file of the same Judge. That was suit filed by the widow of Nanoo claiming damages as a result of the accident, referred to already. In that suit the Court below decreed a sum of Rs. 22,500. 00 in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants.
( 4 ) THE case for the plaintiffs in the two
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.