SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Del) 198

I.D.DUA
JOTI PARSHAD – Appellant
Versus
GAJENDRA SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, S.R.GUPTA

I. D. Dua. C. J

( 1 ) THIS is a landlord s second appeal from order under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act 59 of 1958 and is directed against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 4th October, 1963 dismissing the appellant s appeal from the order of the Rent Controller dated 30th March, 1963 holding that Gajendra Sharma (respondent in this Court) continued to be a tenant within the meaning of the definition contained in section 2 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 and was, therefore, competent to file the application for fixation of standard rent of the suit permises as a tenant.

( 2 ) THE circumstances leading to this litigation are that the landlord had initiated proceedings for eviction of the tenant under the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 in which on 18th April, 1957, a consent decree for eviction was made. Thereafter the landlord went to the Slum Authority, but permission to evict the tenant was declined. On 2nd April, 1959, Gajendra Sharma tenant presented the petition out of which this appeal arises for fixation of standard rent under section 6 and 9 of the Delhi Rent Act of 1958. The standard rent was fixed in those proceedings by the Rent Contro












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top