( 1 ) THIS second appeal has been presented by the tenant under section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act No. 59 of 1958 (hereinafter called the Act) against the concurrent decisions of the Rent Control Tribunal and the Additional Rent Controller directing eviction on the ground that the landlord bona fide required the premises in dispute for occupation as residence for himself and the members of his family dependent on him and that he was not already in occupation of a reasonably suitable residential accommodation.

( 2 ). I may at the outset point out that this second appeal is competent only if it involves some substantial question of law. The learned counsel for the appellant has, therefore, very rightly not taken me through the evidence on the record for the purpose of assailing the concurrent conclusions of the two Courts below in favour of the landlord s bona fids requirement. The only question canvassed at the bar relates to the competency of the petition for eviction on the ground that section 14 (6) of the Act operates as a bar. In order to substantiate this objection, Shri N. R. Suri has submitted that the sale-deed in favour of the land- lord transferring t