I.D.DUA
CUSTODIAN OF EVACUI PROPERTY,NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHWAR DAYAL – Respondent
( 2 ) THE circumstances in which the appeal was dismissed as barred by time by the learned Additional District Judge are that from the order of the learned Senior Subordinate judge dated 3-6-1957, a revision was presented in this Court on 18-10-1957. This was referred to a Full Bench by a learned Single Judge of the Punjab High Court in April, 1961 and the Full Bench on 8-12-1961 held that no revision was competent in this Court because the impugned order was appealable. In this Court, the revision had not been converted into an appeal by the learned Single Judge because, I am informed, the learned Single Judge felt that the appeal would have to be presented in the lower Appellate Court. It was in these circumstances that the appeal was presented in the lower Appellate Court on 11-12-1961. I am informed that 8th of Decemb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.