SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Del) 29

N.N.GOSWAMY, D.K.KAPUR
PLYCAST (DELHI) PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
I. T. O. , COMPANY CIRCLE – Respondent


D. K. Kapoor, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS petition was heard after a show cause notice was issued to respondents. On considering the reply we found that the petition could be disposed of without any further pleadings or affidavits. We accordingly heard both the learned counsel. We also found that the disposal of the petition could not be delayed.

( 2 ) WE issue Rule D. B. and proceed to deal with the short point involved in the petition. The petitioner has challanged an order passed U/s 131 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 op 23. 9. 82. The operative part of the order is that certain documents are retained in exercise of powers U/s 131. The documents are : "journal Vouchers---Bank Voucher---"

( 3 ) THE order was passed over three years ago. The poipt for decision is whether these documents can indefinitely be retained or whether there is a time limit. It is also claimed that the documents could have been retained only for 15 days without obtaining prior approval of the Commissioner of I. T. Yet another contention is that these vouchers pertain to sales and purchases made by the petitioner Company from and to suppliers and customers and these documents are required for reference. A parallel was also













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top