SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Del) 86

S.K.KAPUR
RAM LABHAYA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.ARORA, B.DAYAL

S B. Cpoor and H. R. Khanna, JJ.

( 1 ) THISLETTERS Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment of learned Single Jude dated the 6th of March 1964 whereby he dismissed the appellant s writ petition (Civil Writ No. 503-D of 1958) which was under article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant to the decision of the Letters Patent Appeal are not in dispute. The appellant as well as Ram Lal (respodent No. 5)- who is the only contesting respondent to this appeal as well as to the writ petition (hereinafter to be refrred is as the respondent) were allottees of house No. XII/2151 in Subzimandi, Delhi. This house was allotable property and was valued at Rs. 5,963. 00 by the Rehabilitation Department. The dispute beetween the parties relates to the question as to which of them is eligible for the transfer of this property under the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (Act 44 of 1954) (hereinafter to be REFERRED TO as the Act) and the rules thereunder, and the authorities have come to varying decisions from time to time. The question has to be determined with reference to rule 30 of the Rules made under the Act and this rule origina








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top