SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 20

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
SUNI MANOJ MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
BSES RAJDHANI – Respondent


VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE prayer in this Writ Petition is for the grant of compensation in the sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- owing to the untimely death of late Manoj Mathew owing to the negligent acts of the Respondents. The undisputed facts are that late manoj Mathew met with a fatal accident on 17. 6. 2002 at the I. I. T. Flyover, opposite Satnam Taxi Stand. He was rushed to the All India Institute of Medical sciences (AIIMS ). He was driving his motorcycle at the time when he encountered his death. He died within six hours of the accident. The Petition has been filed by his wife and son.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 3 is the Commissioner of Police. The only grievance against this Respondent pertains to the timely recording of the First information Report (FIR ). It now transpires that the criminal proceedings are underway against Shri Mudrax Parashar, owner of MSS Bijlee Bharti, having his office at Y 2a, Phase-II, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi. No liability can be fastened on the said Respondent No. 3 or on the Government of National Capital territory of Delhi.

( 3 ) THE fatal and tragic accident was caused because a metal ladder used for repairing street lighting had moved or rolled d









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top