BADAR DURREZ AHMED
M. D. OVERSEAS LTD – Appellant
Versus
UMA SHANKAR KAMAL NARAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application filed under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `the CPC ) on behalf of defendants No. 1 and 2 seeking leave to defend. The plaintiff had filed this suit under Order XXXVII Rule 1 based upon four cheques which had been issued by the defendant No. 2 in favour of the plaintiff. The averments contained in the plaint disclose that the plaintiff is engaged in the Import and Export of precious metals. The defendants No. 1 and 2 are in the jewellery business. It is everred that the plaintiff and the said defendants have had dealings for some time and they have a running account between them. Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 were directed to be deleted from the array of parties by an order of this Court on 14. 11. 2005. The reason being that the defendant No. 1 is not a partnership firm as alleged in the plaint but a proprietorship concern of which the defendant no. 2 is the sole proprietor.
( 2 ) IT is the plaintiff s case that the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 placed an order upon the plaintiff for supply of gold bars totaling 700 tolas. According to the plaintiff, these 700 tolas of gold bars were su
REFERRED TO : Sunil Enterprises and Anr. v. SBI Commercial and International Bank Ltd.
Milkhiram (India) Private Ltd. v. Chaman Lal Bros.
Michalec Eng. and Mfg. v. Bank Equipment Coproration
Hindustan Apparel Industries v. Fair Deal Corporation, New Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.