SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 34

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
M. D. OVERSEAS LTD – Appellant
Versus
UMA SHANKAR KAMAL NARAIN – Respondent


BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as `the CPC ) on behalf of defendants No. 1 and 2 seeking leave to defend. The plaintiff had filed this suit under Order XXXVII Rule 1 based upon four cheques which had been issued by the defendant No. 2 in favour of the plaintiff. The averments contained in the plaint disclose that the plaintiff is engaged in the Import and Export of precious metals. The defendants No. 1 and 2 are in the jewellery business. It is everred that the plaintiff and the said defendants have had dealings for some time and they have a running account between them. Defendant Nos. 3 and 4 were directed to be deleted from the array of parties by an order of this Court on 14. 11. 2005. The reason being that the defendant No. 1 is not a partnership firm as alleged in the plaint but a proprietorship concern of which the defendant no. 2 is the sole proprietor.

( 2 ) IT is the plaintiff s case that the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 placed an order upon the plaintiff for supply of gold bars totaling 700 tolas. According to the plaintiff, these 700 tolas of gold bars were su


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top