SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 62

SWATANTER KUMAR
YAHOO INC. – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY V. SHAH – Respondent


SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff is stated to be a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA with its office at california, USA. Ms. Sunita K. Sreedharan is the constituted attorney of the plaintiff and is duly authorized by and under a power of attorney to sign and verify the pleadings and to institute the present suit. The present plaint has been signed and verified by the said Ms. Sunita K. Sreedharan. The plaintiff is a global internet media company that offers a branded network of comprehensive information, communication and shopping services to millions of users under its unique and highly distinctive trademark yahoo! since June, 1994. It is the case of the plaintiff that the services provided by the plaintiff enables internet users, even nontechnical ones, to find information relevant for their purposes out of the plethora of contents of the worldwide web. The plaintiff was amongst the first in the field to start a web directory and provide search services. Earlier this directory was called jerry and David s Guide to the Worldwide Web . But later on the name was changed to yahoo! as it fit in with the founder s perception of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top