SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 84

MADAN B.LOKUR
DAULAT RAM – Appellant
Versus
U. O. I – Respondent


MARKANDEYA KATJU, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 24. 11. 2005. We have heard the counsel for the appellant.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the petitioners were daily wager class-IV employees in the school and their services are stated to have been terminated on 30. 10. 2002. It has been held in The Bangalore Water Supply and LPA 61-66/2006 Page 1 of 2 sewerage Board vs. A. Rajappa and Ors. AIR 1978 SC 969 that a school is also an industry. Hence, in our opinion, the appellants are workmen under the Industrial disputes Act and there is an alternative remedy of raising an industrial disputes. Hence, without going into the merits of the controversy, we are of the opinion that the writ petition was liable to be dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy of raising the Industrial Disputes under the Industrial disputes Act. If and when the appellants raise such a dispute and it is referred to the Labour Court/tribunal we hope and trust the same will be decided expeditiously. Appeal is dismissed.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top