SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 372

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
H. K. GOODS TRANSPORT PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH CHANDER BAMMI – Respondent


SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF No. 1 is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies act, 1956 stated to be doing the business of transportation of goods. Plaintiff no. 2 is the father of plaintiff No. 4 and defendant No. 1. Defendants No. 2 and 3 are the sons of defendant No. 1. The family tree of the parties is as under: harbans Lal Bammi ramesh Chander Bammi subhash Chander Bammi chander Prakash Bammi charan Bammi gaurav Bammi anupama Saini tanuja Bammi nikhil Bammi megha Bammi

( 2 ) THE suit has been filed seeking a declaration that the defendants have no right to interfere with the business of plaintiff No. 1 company and for permanent injunction from interfering with the business of the said plaintiff no. 1 company. An injunction is also sought against the defendants from writing defamatory letters in respect of the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs have claimed damages of Rs. 20 lakhs on that account.

( 3 ) THE defendants were served, but chose not to appear and were proceeded ex- parte. The matter was passed over at the request of plaintiffs counsel but no one appeared on second call or even after lunch recess.

( 4 ) THE plaintiffs were directed to file the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top