BADAR DURREZ AHMED
PFIZER PRODUCTS, INC. – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH CHOPRA – Respondent
( 1 ) ALTHOUGH this application is styled as an application under Order 7 Rule 11 for rejection of the plaint for want of territorial jurisdiction, it is actually an application under Order 7 Rule 10 for return of the plaint. The learned counsel for the parties have argued this application on the understanding that this is an application under Order 7 Rule 10 and it is with this understanding that the present application is being disposed of.
( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the defendants/ applicants submitted that this court does not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present suit. The suit filed by the plaintiff is one for injunction and damages for passing off and unfair competition. The learned counsel for the defendants referred to paragraph 48 of the plaint to show that the plaintiff has approached this court on account of two factors. The first factor. being that the defendants had applied for registration of the trademark GEODON and ZOLOFT in Delhi in the Trade Mark Registration which is in the jurisdiction of this court. The second factor stated by the plaintiff to give this court jurisdiction to entertain the present suit was that, acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.