SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 515

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
LALDEE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

( 1 ) OMP No. 132/2002 the present proceedings have been filed by the petitioner under section 33 of the Arbitration Act 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) seeking to determine the existence and validity of the arbitration clause contained in clause (b) of Para 2900 of ISR conditions of contract and to revoke the authority of respondent no-2 arbitrator in view of the order dated 14. 01. 1991 passed in OMP NO. 100/87 by this court.

( 2 ) THE dispute relates to a purchase order placed by respondent no. 1 on the petitioner dated 13. 12. 1978. In view of the arbitration clause forming part of the terms and conditions of contract, the respondent no. 1 invoked the arbitration clause in terms of notice dated 22. 04. 1980 for non supply under the purchase Order of MS Two Way Keys. The matter was referred to the sole arbitration of Sh. J. C. Singhal, who however entered upon reference only on 13. 07. 1984. The respondent no. 1 kept on taking time for filing the statement of claim and in the mean time, the time for making of the award expired. The arbitrator sought extension of time to make and publish the award, but the same was not agreed to by the petit

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top