SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 391

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, O.P.DWIVEDI
ARUN KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV GUPTA – Respondent


MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeals are directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the appellant herein was dismissed on the ground that the appellants/plaintiffs have played fraud on the Court by withholding material informations.

( 2 ) THE appellants as plaintiffs filed a suit for recovery of possession of immovable property under the provisions of Sections 5 and 6 of the Specific Relief act and also for decree of recovery of mesne profits and for a decree of permanent injunction in respect of premises described as 8/289, Sunder Vihar, Paschim Vihar, new Delhi. In the said suit following reliefs were sought for:" (a) a decree jointly or severally may kindly be passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants directing defendants jointly or severally to vacate the suit property bearing municipal No. 8/289, sunder Vihar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi -110 087, measuring 267 sq. yards of land and hand over vacant peaceful possession to the plaintiffs. (b) in an alternate, plaintiffs may be restored back possession of the suit property bearing municipal No. 8/289, Sunder Vihar, Paschim v



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top