SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
MAKALU IMPEX PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VIVEK NAGPAL – Respondent
( 1 ) IA No. 11181/2001 (u/o XXXVII R. 3 (5) CPC) the plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery of Rs 46,70,470/- under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the code ).
( 2 ) THE plaintiff is a company incorporated and registered under the Companies act, 1956. It is the case of the plaintiff that on 09. 07. 1997 defendant came to the office of Mr. R. C. Kapoor, charted accountant and requested the plaintiff through its Manager Rohit Bahl to advance a sum of Rs 25 lakh as loan. The plaintiff wanted collateral security and the defendant in view of the same surrendered 1,13,000 shares bearing distinctive numbers from 020082703-020195702 of M/s Padmini Polymers Ltd. The defendant is further stated to have given additional 29,000 shares bearing distinctive numbers from 020195703-020224702 of the same company towards the margin money for performance of the said agreement as prevalent in the market. On surrender of the said shares, the sum of Rs 25,00,000 was advanced to the defendant and sale confirmation was executed.
( 3 ) IT is stated that the defendant approached the plaintiff for execution of an agreem
Referred to : Chinataman Dhundiraj v. Sadguru Narayan Maharaj Datta Sansthan and Ors
Jiwanlal Achariya v. Rameshwarlal Agarwalla
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay South, Bombay v. Messrs. Ogale Glass Works Ltd, Ogale Wadi
Ashok K.Khurna v. M/s.Steelman Industries and Anr
DCM Financial Services Ltd v. Sunil Kala and Co. and Anr.
Munoth Investments Ltd v. Puttukola Prperties Ltd and Anr.
Rajesh Kumari v. Prem Chand Jain
M/s.Mechalec Engineers and Manufacturers v. M/s.Basic Equipment Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.