MARKANDEYA KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 24. 11. 2005.

( 2 ) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

( 3 ) THE facts in detail have been set out in the judgment of the learned Single judge and hence we are not repeating the same except where necessary.

( 4 ) THE petitioner had participated in a bid for auction of land held by the DDA and he has alleged that his bid was highest and he paid 25% of the bid amount. However, the bid was not confirmed by the competent authority (the Vice-Chairman of DDA) who has communicated his decision to the petitioner by letter dated 25. 8. 1988.

( 5 ) IT is alleged in paragraph 9 of the writ petition that no reason at all was communicated to the petitioner as to why the auction has been cancelled, and subsequent inquiries made by the petitioner revealed that Mr. Mahesh Chandra sharma, Ex-Municipal Councillor had written a letter to the Vice-Chairman of the dda informing him that the plot covered by the auction was being used by Swamy dayanand Library and the same should not have been auctioned but should have been allotted to Swami Dayanand Librar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document