( 1 ) C. M. (M) 192 of 2001 challenges order dated 22. 1. 2001 of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal (for short the Tribunal ) in R. C. A. No. 47 of 1997 whereby the learned Tribunal partly allowed the appeal holding - "the appeal is accordingly partly allowed. The respondent shall deposit the rent up-to- date in the Court below within one month of the date of this order. In case of any dispute about non-deposit of the rent, they shall appear before this Court so that controversy about the rent up-to-date is finally settled. In the event deposit is to the satisfaction of the appellant, benefit of Section 14 (2), DRC Act shall be extended to the respondent and in the event it is not upto the satisfaction, final appropriate order shall be passed by this Court in the event in dispute".

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case, as have been noted by the Tribunal, are as follows:"1. An eviction petition was preferred by the appellant against the respondent under Section 14 (1) (a) r/w Section 14 (1) (c) of the DRC Act. The Court below dismissed the petition of the appellant. An appeal has been preferred against the order of the Court below. During the course of the arguments onl