SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 647

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
K. R. JAIN – Respondent


SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS LPA has been preferred against the impugned judgment of the learned single Judge dated 23. 11. 2004 by which he allowed the miscellaneous applications of NDPL holding that NDPL was not liable to pay the dues of respondent No1 and it was the appellants who were liable for the same.

( 2 ) SHRI K. R. Jain, respondent No1 was working with Delhi Vidyut Board and had retired after attaining the age of superannuation on 31. 7. 1996. He filed a writ petition in 2004 bearing Number WP ( C) No. 2337/04 before this court alleging that he was discriminated by the Delhi Vidyut Board and was not given higher scale to which he was entitled before his retirement under the Time Bound promotion Scheme in terms of office order No. 216 dated 16. 7. 1997 notified on 23. 7. 1997. He prayed for issuance of a Mandamus for giving him the higher scale, arrears of pay and allowances/emoluments as accrued to him along with 18 % interest and prayed that the office order dated 7. 2. 02 denying him benefits due be set aside and quashed. His petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 23. 3. 04 which reads as under:" 23. 03. 04 present: Mr. L,. D. Adlakh






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top