SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 382

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, MARKANDEY KATJU
PARIVARTAN – Appellant
Versus
MCD – Respondent


MARKANDEYA KATJU, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed with a prayer for a mandamus directing the respondents/commissioner of Police to register an FIR into the complaint of the petitioners and to get the matter investigated. The petitioners has also prayed for a direction to respondents to prosecute the guilty officials and contractors and also to initiate departmental proceedings against certain officers.

( 2 ) IT appears that this writ petition had been disposed of by a judgment of a division Bench of this Court dated 24. 5. 2004 which reads as follows:"24. 5. 2004 present : Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant Bhushan for the petitioner mr. Kailash Gambhir for the respondent/nct of Delhi mr. Cheta Dutta for MCD wp (C) No. 7288-89/2004 the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to give a copy of the report to the Counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges. A police officer of the rank of ACP will investigate the matter and shall submit a report to the Court of competent jurisdiction in this behalf within six months. Liberty to move the Court in case of difficulty. The petition stands disposed of. Chief Justice badar Durrez Ahmed, J. May 24, 200












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top