SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 457

R.S.SODHI
KIRLOSKAR COPELAND LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DALJEET SINGH – Respondent


R. S. SODHI J.

( 1 ) CM (M)1732/2004 is directed against the order dated 16. 11. 2004 of the Additional district Judge, Delhi whereby the learned judge has disposed of an application under order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment to enhance the valuation of the Suit to rs. 25,00,000/- (rupees twenty five lakhs) for the purposes of jurisdiction.

( 2 ) NOBODY appears for the respondent in spite of service. The facts as stated in the application are as follows:-". . . that the plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction, infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts against the Defendant. An injunction order was passed against the defendants restraining them from dealing in re-conditioned compressors and components under the trademark kirloskar. After the injunction order another Local Commissioner was appointed who recovered huge infringing material from the premises of the defendants and it appears that the defendants had been violating the said interim order. The Plaintiff has further stated that after violation of the order the Defendants might have made profit of more than 25 lakhs while infringing the trademark of the Plaintiff. The plaintif








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top