S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

( 1 ) IN these proceedings the Writ Petitioner has sought various reliefs. This pertains to his grievance in regard to an Order dated 16. 4. 2001 suspending him from the services of the second Respondent (hereafter called as "the College" ).

( 2 ) THE writ petition had been heard and disposed off by a judgment dated 17/5/2004 in which it was held that the Governing Body of the College was not empowered to suspend or terminate the services of the Petitioner, its Principal, without prior approval of the Executive Council. In the course of hearing the petitioner had confined his reliefs to claim a challenge to the order of suspension on four specific grounds. The judgment set aside the suspension for the reason that it had been issued by the Governing Body and therefore not authorized by law. It was carried in appeal to the Division Bench which by its judgment dated 7/12/2005 in LPA No. 566/2004, set aside the judgment dated 17/4/2004 It was held that the Governing Body had power to suspend the petitioner. The Division Bench required a fresh hearing and disposal on the other issues pertaining to the Petitioner s challenge to his suspension. Facts of the Case :

( 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document