SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 771

RAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) BY this order, we would dispose of four applications filed by the petitioners in the above writ petition.

( 2 ) CM No. 5369/2005 has been filed under Order 9 Rule 4 of the CPC for recalling the order dated 10/3/2005; CM No. 5370/2005 is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condoning the delay in filing CM 5369/2005; CM No. 6683/2005 has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with section 151 of the CPC for reviewing the order dated 10th March, 2005 and CM No. 6684/2005 is again an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing CM No. 6683/2005.

( 3 ) THE petitioners filed a writ petition in the year 1986 questioning the correctness of the notification issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) dated 27/1/84 in relation to the acquisition of land in the revenue estate of village Palam. Besides issuance of a declaration under Section 6, an award was made by the Collector in relation to the acquired land being award No. 157/86-87. The challenge in the writ petition was to the notification as well as to the award made by the Collector. This writ petit







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top