SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 526

B.N.CHATURVEDI
CRACK DETECTIVES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
P. S. MALHOTRA – Respondent


B. N. CHATURVEDI, J.

( 1 ) 1. Admit.

( 2 ) FOLLOWING substantial question of law is formulated for decision of the appeal: whether documents Ex. PW-1/3 and/or Ex. PW-1/5 answer the description of a notice contemplated under Section 8 of the Rent Act, to effect increase in rent?

( 3 ) THE appellant, M/s. Crack Detectives Private Limited, is in appeal against an order dated 4. 4. 2005 of learned Additional District Judge setting aside the judgment/order dated 13. 8. 2003 passed by the Court of learned Civil judge, and remanding the case with a direction to decide the suit on merits.

( 4 ) THE respondent filed a suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits in respect of property No. 17,18/23/b-2 Market, Safdarjung enclave, New Delhi, against the appellant.

( 5 ) THE appellant was a tenant under the respondent on the first floor of the aforesaid premises at a monthly rent of Rs. 3,500/-, excluding electricity and water charges since 1st of April, 1988. According to the respondent, he had an agreement with the appellant that the rent of the premises would be enhanced by 20% with effect from 1st of April, 1991. Besides, it was also agreed upon that there would be an
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top