SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 824

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SUSHIL SURI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) TODAY itself, in an identical matter, this court has passed the following directions:-"11. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the condition with regard to the petitioner s seeking permission of the court prior to his going abroad is set aside. The condition requiring the petitioner to submit a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 2 lakhs with one surety of the like amount is sustained. A further direction, in the light of the directions given in the case of Ajit Srimal (supra), requiring the petitioner to inform the court in writing regarding his date of departure and tentative date of his return and broadly indicating the places where he would be staying abroad, is also passed. With these directions, this petition stands disposed of. Dasti to both the parties. "2. The same order will apply to this case also.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top