SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 851

R.S.SODHI
R. P. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR DEY – Respondent


R. S. SODHI J.

( 1 ) CM (M) 616/2005 seeks to challenge the order dated 19. 07. 2004 of the additional Rent Controller in Suit No. E- 119/03/01 whereby the Additional Rent Controller has decreed the suit under section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25 (B) as also under Section 14 (1) (h) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, in respect of property No. P-37, NDSE ? II, New delhi.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case as noted by the Additional Rent Controller, delhi are as follows:-"the petitions no. 119/03 and 120/03 moved by the petitioners against the respondent on the ground of bonafide requirement U/s 14 (1) (e) red with Section 25-B and U/s 14 (1) (h) of DRC Act. The evidence led by the petitioners and responents are the same and both cases have been consolidated by Ld. Predecessor vide order dated 30. 1. 03. As per the petitioner first floor of property no. P-37 n. D. S. E.-II, New Delhi was let out to the respondent on 1. 6. 76 at a monthly rent of Rs. 700/- for residential purposes only as shown in red colour in site plan. The tenancy was created through an oral agreement. The tenancy premises are required bonafidely by the petitioners to be used as residence for himself and his family memb









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top