SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 893

CHARANJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KEHAR SINGH – Respondent


SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 96 CPC is directed against the judgment and decree dated 9th August, 2005 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in Suit No. 38/2005.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,95,500/- against the defendant on the plea that it had sold 300 bags of Mustard stock weighing about 265. 95 Quintal at the rate of Rs. 1932/- per Quintal totalling to Rs. 5,34,463/- to Anand Kumar Jhanwar of Beldanga, District Murshidabad, West Bengal. The sale was effected through bill No. 204 dated 21. 10. 2004 The said goods were transported through G. R. No. 4632 dated 21. 10. 2004 The defendant was paid a sum of Rs. 23,000/- towards advance for cartage of the goods from Delhi to Beldanga, district Murshidabad, West Bengal. Balance cartage amounting to Rs. 10,343/- was payable to the defendant by purchaser/consignee at the time of delivery of the goods. The goods could not be delivered at the destination as the truck and driver were not traceable. The owner of the truck is alleged to have lodged a complaint in this regard on 4th November, 2004 The plaintiff also filed complaints dated 6th November, 2004, 26th November and 6t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top