BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THESE three revision petitions are being disposed of by a common order inasmuch as they raise common issues, although there are separate orders which are impugned in these petitions.

( 2 ) THE facts involved in these three impugned orders are identical. For the sake of brevity, the facts noticed in the impugned order passed in the case of accused Girish Dhawan (in paragraph 2 thereof) are set out herein below :-"the officers of DRI, Delhi Zonal Unit, intercepted a consignment of Antiquities which were being allegedly attempted to be smuggled out to Hongkong in six packages vide shipping Bill No 416 dated 19. 1. 93 by making false declaration as handicraft items of stones. The alleged antiquities were loaded from a container which was parked at ICD Tughlakabad, Okhla, Phase-I, New Delhi. It has been alleged that 18 stone sculptures of Deities recovered were certified to be Antiquities and certified by Archaeological Survey of India. The allegations against accused Girish Dhawan are that his services were engaged for documentation and processing of shipping bills in attempting to export the consignment to Hongkong by promising him a huge sum of rupees. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document