SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1076

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
KULDLP GANDOTRA – Appellant
Versus
SHAILENDRA NATH ENDLAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
O.N.Vohra, SARVESH BISARIA, SHRADHA BHARGAVA

( 1 ) THIS is suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 31 -3-2004 and for possession in respect of Flat no. C-9/9551, Vasant Kunj, New delhi-110070 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said flat' ).

( 2 ) IN the plaint, the plaintiff has averred that on 31-3-2004, an agreement to sell in respect of the said flat was entered into by the plaintiff as the intending purchaser and the defendant No. 1 as the intending seller. The said agreement was entered on behalf of the defendant No. 1 by the defendant No. 2 who held a general power of attorney in her favour. It is further stated in the plaint that the defendant No. 1 had acquired the said flat on allotment from the Delhi development Authority (DDA) and the same was a leasehold property. It is averred that the same was eligible for conversion into freehold on payment of the prescribed charges as per the policy of the DDA. It is further stated that the said flat was in occupation of a tenant who had been inducted by the defendant No. 1 and that the sale would be completed after the property is vacated by the tenant and that at the time of registration, vacant possession of the said flat would be handed over to the plain



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top