SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1125

BADAR DURREZ AHMED
D. A. M. PRABHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Burman, D.C.MATHUR, RICHA KAPUR


BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.

( 1 ) BY way of this revision petition, the petitioners, namely, D. A. M. Prabhu and Vijay Kumar Malhotra, have impugned the order dated 11. 2. 1994 passed by the Special Judge under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The brief facts are that on 23. 1. 1988, a complaint was lodged by the enforcement Inspector with the Station House Officer of Police Station Moti nagar, New Delhi alleging that Swatantar Bharat Mills had, by declaring and stamping wrong fibre compositions for the cloth, contravened the provisions of the textile Commissioner's notification dated 23. 11. 1981 and Clause 17 of the Textile (Control) Order, 1986 rendering themselves liable for penal action for violation of the order made under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 punishable under Section 7 thereof. On 11. 2. 1988, an FIR was registered on the basis of the said complaint. On 6. 5. 1988, the charge-sheet was filed in Court, but there was only one accused, namely, A. K. Rohatgi, who was shown in Column No. 4 for the offence, inter alia, under Section 7 of the said Act. On that date, the Court passed the following order: "new challan filed today. It be checked and registe








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top