SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1120

S.N.AGGARWAL
YASHODHA NANDAN DIXIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE (N. C. T. ) OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, KAMAL MEHTA, M.TARIQUE SIDDIQUI, Mukta Gupta, Rajdipa Behura


S. N. AGGARWAL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner claim themselves to be Pujaris of Shiv mandir, Y-Block, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi. This Mandir is stated to be built on a plot area of 450 sq. yards. The cause brought by the petitioners before this Court through this writ petition is that the Mandir property is going to be grabbed by certain toughes of the locality who have been impleaded as respondent Nos. 2 to 13 in the present writ petition. The petitioners are stated to have made several complaints regarding grabbing of Mandir property by outsiders to the police of sarojini Nagar and also to the DCP (South West) between 7/4/2004 and 27/4/2004. The grievance of the petitioners is that the police is siding with respondent Nos. 2 to 13 who intend to grab the Mandirproperty and forthat reason the petitioners have prayed for investigation into the matter to be conducted by Special Branch of Delhi police and for initiating criminal proceedings against respondent Nos. 2 to 13.

( 2 ) NOTICE of this writ petition was issued to the respondents and in response thereto, status report has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and a detailed counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 13.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top