SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1108

T.S.THAKUR, SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
NARESH AHLAWAT – Appellant
Versus
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.HARI SHANKAR, HARPRIT SINGH, JAGDISH, P.Mohapatra

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal arises out of an order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court whereby a writ petition filed by the appellant herein challenging an order granting only 50% back wages during the period of his suspension has been dismissed.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was working as Lower Division Clerk in the MTNL. He was arrested in connection with FIR No. 268/1985 for an offence punishable under section 376/302 of the IPC. He was on that basis placed under suspension in september 1985. An Additional Sessions Judge before whom the petitioner was tried for the offences aforementioned, eventually convicted and sentenced him to life imprisonment holding that the charge of rape with murder was established against the petitioner.

( 3 ) IN an appeal preferred by the petitioner against the said order of conviction and sentence, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana acquitted the petitioner in terms of a judgment dated 4th October, 1993. Shortly thereafter, the petitioner represented to the respondent for revocation of his suspension and reinstatement in service. This was followed by reminders and eventually a legal notice seeking the petitioner's reinstatement. In the me












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top