SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 1111

MANMOHAN SARIN
ARIFA NAUMAN – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Seth, M.A.Niyazi, RITU BHARDHWAZ, S.N.BHANDARI, SANTOSH KUMAR


MANMOHAN SARIN, J.

( 1 ) BY this review petition, applicant-petitioner Mrs. Arif Nauman seeks review of the judgment and order dated 26. 10. 2000 by which W. P. (C) No. 7138/2003 was dismissed holding that there was an efficacious alternate remedy under the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 and the dispute was such that the petitioner be relegated to the same. The impugned order of transfer was stayed for a period of two months to enable the petitioner to avail of the legal remedy under the Industrial Disputes Act. Notice in the review petition had been issued and the interim protection granted vide judgment dated 26. 10. 2004 was directed to continue.

( 2 ) THE petitioner who is employed with the respondent No. 3 Hamdard Wakf laboratories as a stenographer, had challenged in the writ petition the order dated 1. 11. 2003 transferring her to Aurangabad (Maharashtra ). Petitioner, who was working at the head office in Delhi, contended that her transfer thousands of miles away was amala fide one and to victimize her for the active participation in trade union activities of her husband, who was the General Secretary of respondent No. 3's workers union. Petitioner claimed that never befor















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top