S. MURALIDHAR J.

( 1 ) THESE two applications CM No. 8513/2006 in W. P. (C) 3916/1990 CM No. 9394/2006 in Cont. Cas. (C) 88/92, have been filed seeking recall of an order dated 3. 7. 2006 passed by us in writ petition W. P. (C) No. 3916 of 1990 and contempt Case No. 88/1992.

( 2 ) THESE applications are filed by the petitioner whose counsel on record submitted before us that on the earlier date of hearing i. e 3. 7. 2006, he was in some serious personal difficulty and was unable to attend the hearing. We may mention here that on 3. 7. 2006 we passed over the matter once and when no one was present on behalf of the petitioner even on the second call, we proceeded to hear counsel for the respondent and passed the final order dated 3. 7. 2006.

( 3 ) ALTHOUGH these applications are designed as applications for recall of our order dated 3. 7. 2006, they really are petitions seeking a review of that order. Counsel for the petitioner was unable to show us any provision in the CPC or the Rules of this Court, that permits an application for ?recall? to be filed. The omnibus provision of S. 151 CPC ought not to be pressed into service when there are specific provisions in the CPC and this